Federer Vs Sampras

Grand Slam..FastForward...Rounds..Pause..Final..Federer..Play.."Fedex Lifts Grand Slam Title No 11" This has become a routine in Mens Tennis..Why??? Because Federer is playing the Tennis of his life.It started in 2001 when Fedex defeated four-time defending champion and seven-time Wimbledon champion Pete Sampras in the fourth round..I believe this was the turning point of his career and the tennis he started play after this was phenomenal.Tennis in this 21st century could be defined by telling FEDERER.. Fedex (a.k.a) Federer has won 11 Grand Slams so far.He is just 25 and he has achieved something that other stars took 13-14 Grand Slams more...Lets take a look at his opponents ..Nadal, Hewitt, Roddick, .....Hmmm cant remember anyone else !!!!..these are the current class players there are many more starts but the above 3 are his major threats..Are they really???? Just kidding.lets take a look at fedex titles

Wins (11)

Year	Championship	Opponent in Final	Score in Final
2003	Wimbledon (1st)	Mark Philippoussis	7-6(5), 6-2, 7-6(3)
2004	Australian Open (1st)	Marat Safin	7-6(3), 6-4, 6-2
2004	Wimbledon (2nd)	Andy Roddick	4-6, 7-5, 7-6(3), 6-4
2004	U.S. Open (1st)	Lleyton Hewitt	6-0, 7-6(3), 6-0
2005	Wimbledon (3rd)	Andy Roddick	6-2, 7-6(2), 6-4
2005	U.S. Open (2nd)	Andre Agassi	6-3, 2-6, 7-6(1), 6-1
2006	Australian Open (2nd)	Marcos Baghdatis	5-7, 7-5, 6-0, 6-2
2006	Wimbledon (4th)	Rafael Nadal	6-0, 7-6(5), 6-7(2), 6-3
2006	U.S. Open (3rd)	Andy Roddick	6-2, 4-6, 7-5, 6-1
2007	Australian Open (3rd)	Fernando González	7-6(2), 6-4, 6-4
2007	Wimbledon (5th)	Rafael Nadal	7-6(7), 4-6, 7-6(3), 2-6, 6-2

Lets know take the champion Pete Sampras..He has 14 Grand Slam titles under his belt..and was inducted into the Tennis Hall of Fame..Below is the list of titles he has won

Year	Championship	Opponent in Final	Score in Final
1990	U.S. Open	Andre Agassi	6-4, 6-3, 6-2
1993	Wimbledon	Jim Courier	7-6, 7-6, 3-6, 6-3
1993	U.S. Open (2)	Cédric Pioline	6-4, 6-4, 6-3
1994	Australian Open	Todd Martin	7-6, 6-4, 6-4
1994	Wimbledon (2)	Goran Ivanišević	7-6, 7-6, 6-0
1995	Wimbledon (3)	Boris Becker	6-7, 6-2, 6-4, 6-2
1995	U.S. Open (3)	Andre Agassi	6-4, 6-3, 4-6, 7-5
1996	U.S. Open (4)	Michael Chang	6-1, 6-4, 7-6
1997	Australian Open (2)	Carlos Moyá	6-2, 6-3, 6-3
1997	Wimbledon (4)	Cédric Pioline	6-4, 6-2, 6-4
1998	Wimbledon (5)	Goran Ivanišević	6-7, 7-6, 6-4, 3-6, 6-2
1999	Wimbledon (6)	Andre Agassi	6-3, 6-4, 7-5
2000	Wimbledon (7)	Patrick Rafter	6-7, 7-6, 6-4, 6-2
2002	U.S. Open (5)	Andre Agassi	6-3, 6-4, 5-7, 6-4

Looking at the above statistics..Look at the class of players out there..Agassi,Rafter,Moya,Becker,Courier...on and on.. His last Grand Slam title was a beauty where is overcame tough opponents and won..

P.S. The above data has been taken from Wikipedia

Lets compare both of them..Both of them have their own class. Sampras Back hand and Fedex Forehand..Fedex and Sampras are great servers but Sampras is better when it comes to Serve and volley..
Sampras and Fedex are Mr.Cool during a match..

The advantage Fedex is now facing is he is dominating amongst these youngsters in the present era..Nothing to take from Fedex but one final question.."Could he have won 11 titles had he faced the same quality of opponents that Sampras faced?? "

Last but not the least...FEDEX is like TENDULKAR and SAMPRAS Is like DON BRADMAN..the Current Master : All time Great

Product or Service Based Company : Where would you like to work???

I had been working in a service based company for the past 21 months. One thing that always kept me thinking was "Am I in the right kind of company doing the right kind of work!!!!!"..

Lets first start of with the major service based companies in INDIA... Service Companies have an attrition rate of atleast 10-15% percent every year..For a company with 70,000 employees an attrition rate of 10% will count for 7000 employees!!!! Its a very huge figure.

Check this article..its very interesting ....

http://infotech.indiatimes.com/articleshow/925121.cms

One of the primary reasons for attrition is the pay scale. A Service based company gives you a pay of 3 Lacs p.a for a fresher and a product based company for the same job profile you could get a pay of around 4.5 - 5 Lacs p.a ..In addition to this difference in pay scale you get a lof of other benefits..bonus,holiday packages..etc all because a Product based company has lesser number of people and are more people oriented..

An Important perception that comes in is "I am doing the Cream of the work"...I felt that the product do give the simple work to the services company and the cream work is done by them...Is it true???? Still thinking...

Money comes in next if your satisfied with the job you do..I am ready to work for a lower package if my job gives me the right kind of exposure and I am able to answer these question "What I am doing? Why I am doing? and the Application of this work that I am doing"..The major difference I see in a product based company is that they are working in the complete application/coding and hence the people around there would be able to help you and give answers for these abstruse questions whereas we in a service based company will be able to answer those questions put to us in pre-application. Lets take an example of a simple SOC a system on chip..we have many modules working with different applications inside of it. We as a Service company look at the work from a verification perspective and not from an application perspective. I do know what each module does inside the SOC but do I know how it works in the actual application???? NO!!!! This is where I find a major difference in between a Service and a Product based company.

The technical challenges and innovation will be similar but a services company does not own the intellectual property and also does not take the responsibility of the success of the idea. This responsibility makes a product company special because it makes long term revenue for the company. I do not know a lot about services industry but have heard they also depend a lot on price competitiveness..

""A product company uses its people to create intellectual property.

A services company rents its people out so others can create intellectual property.

A product company takes a $20/hour Java programmer and uses her skills to create a $20 million product.

A services company takes a $20/hour Java programmer and rents him out for $25/hour.""

Despite the advantages in a product based company..it has some disadvantages also.. The major disadvantage being the ROLE I play in the Product based company is mostly going to be fixed throughout my tenure but in a service based company the ROLE is flexible...You will be exposed to the various technologies around the globe since you are working for different customers..

The other major diasdvantage in a Producy based company is that I design a chip thinking its going to yield a billion dollar business..The service company has done the testing the Product company has finally verified and launched the product..What happens if my chip doesnt sell????? For a service based company it means nothing but a client lost or in trouble and catch a new one but for a product based company you are loosing out a billion dollar revenue and the future looks bleak and you could well end up on the wrong side " Your Fired !!!!"

Well after these arguments what I see is I am in a metastable state not knowing whether my flip flop will yield a 0 or 1 in favor of these companies..

http://www.newdelhitimes.org/archives/2007/05/the_product_com.html

P.S..All these are based on personal opinions